2025 DJI AGRAS T50

2025

DJI

AGRAS T50

5

F3411-22A-RID-B

New

Be First in the Field – Lead with Innovation Whats the hype all about book a demo and see why T50 Drone: High-performance drone model. 3 Batteries: For extended flying time. C8000 Intelligent Battery Station: A station for charging and maintaining the batteries. 2 AC Cables: For power connections. WB37 Intelligent Battery: A battery specifically for controllers or other accessories. WB37 Charging Hub: A hub for charging the WB37 battery. Battery Cooler Fan Adapter Cable: Helps keep the batteries cool during charging or operation. Atomized Sprinkler Package Installed: For precision agricultural spraying. DGI Relay: Likely used for enhancing communication or extending control range. Spreading System: For granular spreading applications (such as fertilizers or seeds). D12000i Extension Cable: Likely for extending the range or power supply for the system. There are several benefits to using a T50 drone-based spraying system over traditional plane and land unit sprayers. Here's a comparison based on key factors: 1. Precision and Accuracy Drone Sprayers (T50): Drones offer precise application of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides. They can target specific areas of a field with high accuracy, reducing the risk of over-spraying or missing spots. The atomized sprinkler system ensures even distribution. Plane Sprayers: Planes spray over a large area but can be affected by wind and other environmental factors, leading to less accuracy. There is a higher chance of drift and wastage. Land Unit Sprayers: Ground sprayers have good accuracy on flat terrains, but they struggle with uneven or inaccessible areas (e.g., wet soil, hills, or dense crops). 2. Efficiency in Difficult Terrain Drone Sprayers (T50): Drones excel in difficult or uneven terrain, as they can fly over obstacles like trees, hills, and waterlogged areas. They don't need to touch the ground, making them ideal for areas where tractors or other land-based units can't operate. Plane Sprayers: Planes are great for large, flat areas but may have difficulty with smaller or irregularly shaped fields. They need significant space for takeoff and landing, limiting their use in certain areas. Land Unit Sprayers: Ground sprayers can be hindered by muddy or hilly terrain. They may also damage crops when driving through fields, especially if the ground is soft. 3. Reduced Chemical Usage and Environmental Impact Drone Sprayers (T50): The precision of drones reduces the amount of chemicals needed, minimizing environmental impact. By using technology like the spreading system and atomized spraying, drones apply chemicals only where needed, which reduces wastage and drift. Plane Sprayers: Planes tend to use more chemicals because of the difficulty in targeting specific areas, and spray drift can be a problem, potentially contaminating nearby areas. Land Unit Sprayers: They can also be wasteful due to uneven application, particularly in harder-to-reach areas. Oversaturation is a risk on wet ground, which could lead to runoff into water sources. 4. Cost-Effectiveness Drone Sprayers (T50): Initial investment in a drone might be high, but it offers lower operational costs due to reduced labor, lower fuel usage, and more efficient chemical use. Maintenance is also less frequent compared to planes or tractors. Plane Sprayers: Planes require significant fuel costs, licensed pilots, and ongoing maintenance, making them expensive to operate. They are best suited for very large-scale operations. Land Unit Sprayers: While cheaper to operate than planes, they require significant fuel, and maintenance costs can be high for large units. Operating on difficult terrain increases wear and tear, adding to the cost over time. 5. Speed and Flexibility Drone Sprayers (T50): Drones are quick to deploy and can be easily programmed for specific tasks. They can cover small to medium-sized fields efficiently, especially where flexibility is needed for irregularly shaped areas. Plane Sprayers: Planes can cover large areas quickly but lack flexibility for smaller, irregular fields. Land Unit Sprayers: Land sprayers are slower and can only cover ground at a certain pace. Turning and covering irregular or smaller fields is more time-consuming compared to drones. 6. Labor and Safety Drone Sprayers (T50): Drone operations require less labor and can often be managed by one person, reducing labor costs. Additionally, drone spraying keeps operators out of hazardous zones, such as areas with harmful chemicals. Plane Sprayers: Planes require skilled pilots and ground crews, making labor more complex and expensive. There is also a higher risk associated with flying planes at low altitudes near obstacles. Land Unit Sprayers: Operating ground-based sprayers can be labor-intensive, especially in large areas. There’s also a risk of exposing operators to chemicals during loading or spraying. 7. Versatility Drone Sprayers (T50): Drones are highly versatile. They can switch between spraying liquid chemicals and spreading granular substances (such as seeds or fertilizers). They can also perform other tasks like field mapping and crop monitoring with minimal modifications. Plane Sprayers: Planes are less versatile, mostly limited to liquid spraying. They also lack the capability to monitor crops or adapt easily to different tasks. Land Unit Sprayers: Ground sprayers have some versatility but are limited by terrain and accessibility. They often require more manual adjustments or even separate units for different tasks. 8. Environmental and Crop Protection Drone Sprayers (T50): Because drones fly close to the crops, they reduce the drift associated with spraying. This reduces chemical exposure to non-target areas (including nearby water sources or human populations) and is more environmentally friendly. Plane Sprayers: Planes are prone to drift due to higher altitudes and wind conditions, which can harm non-target areas. Land Unit Sprayers: Ground units might compact soil or cause damage to crops if not handled carefully, especially in delicate growth stages. 9. Accessibility and Adaptability Drone Sprayers (T50): Drones can access remote or hard-to-reach areas without requiring significant infrastructure. They are highly adaptable for a variety of field shapes and sizes. Plane Sprayers: Planes require runways or flat areas for takeoff and landing, which may not always be available or convenient near fields. Land Unit Sprayers: Ground sprayers may struggle with areas where access is limited or the terrain is too challenging. Conclusion Using the T50 drone sprayer provides higher precision, adaptability to difficult terrains, cost savings on chemicals, and flexibility that neither plane nor land unit sprayers can match. While planes are useful for very large fields and flat terrains, drones excel in versatility and precision for a wide range of agricultural spraying tasks. Ground sprayers, though reliable for certain jobs, often lack the flexibility, speed, and efficiency of drones in modern agricultural practices.

Agricultural